More Pages: Hawaii Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67


My Childhood Favorite!
This "sweeping saga" for girls has it all.

Pearl Harbor through the lens
A visual perspective on Pearl Harbor

An Academic Assessment of Signals IntelligenceThe book combines archival evidence with secondary accounts to develop new views. Wilford definitely shows that the American Navy was partially reading Japanese naval messages by late 1941, although he cannot show how much was read. He reviews the content of the intercepted messages and discusses possibilities. In a more conclusive section, Wilford shows that American direction finding and radio signals analysis was quite advanced, and argues that the Japanese strike force (Kido Butai) was tracked, owing to its use of inter-ship communications during the voyage to Hawaii. In a section on intelligence reporting, Wilford expands his theme of American "foreknowledge" to Allied "foreknowledge". Wilford quotes from postwar testimonials to build a case showing that the British produced an accurate estimate of Japan's most likely move in the Pacific - an attack on Pearl Harbor. This book will appeal to specialists because of its methodical study of signals intelligence collected before the Pearl Harbor attack, and its appreciation of the historical significance of such intelligence operations.
A scholarly study of the Pearl Harbor controversyFirstly, Wilford places the Pearl Harbor attack in a broad historical perspective, offering readers a survey of the events that led to a political crisis between the United States and Japan. Secondly, he examines the state of U.S. Navy "cryptanalysis" (code-breaking) in 1941, using contemporaneous primary evidence, concluding that the U.S. had partial reading ability of the principal Japanese Navy Code, and that important information concerning the existence of a Strike Force and some of its plans may have been accessible to American intelligence. Thirdly, Wilford assesses U.S. Navy "traffic analysis", or direction-finding and signals analysis, as a means of providing foreknowledge of Japan's actions in the North Pacific. In this section, Wilford develops a case against the claim of Japanese radio silence and reconstructs the Strike Force communications plan. He also reconstructs the Dec. 3/41 report of Leslie Grogan, based on Grogan's written accounts and Grogan's interviews with historian Ladislas Farago. Fourthly, Wilford looks at U.S. Navy intelligence reporting and Allied intelligence support, producing even more original research concerning British foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, based upon Canadian sources. Finally, he concludes that sufficient radio intelligence existed to predict the Pearl Harbor attack - complete surprise at Pearl Harbor could only have resulted from an enormous failure in intelligence reporting ("gross neglect") or a Washington plan to sacrifice Pearl Harbor to enter WWII ("careful design", Wilford's euphemism for a secret plan or conspiracy).
Wilford's research and interpretation is strikingly original and will appeal to those interested in Intelligence History, Pearl Harbor Historiography, or the Pacific War in general. The general reader should note that this is quite a technical book, dealing at length with the principles of radio communications and intelligence (there are 449 footnotes, and 10 pages of bibliographic sources, many representing newly-released archival material). However, in the book's conclusion, Wilford succeeds at placing his research in a broader perspective, and reflects on the meaning of the "traditionalist" and "revisionist" views, asking some rather poignant questions. "Pearl Harbor Redefined" will likely compel some historians to re-appraise the events that led to the Pacific War.


gorgeous, lush and beautiful book
Eye Candy

writing and illustrations weave colorful picture of life
Full of wit and wisdom ... fascinating look at Hawaii

The Quack Corp - an incredible book
An excellent first person account of a Marine in the Pacific

WOLF STALKER
An outstanding mystery for young readers!

A Great Book for People of All Ages!
A beautiful representation of Hawaii's multi-racial culture

Twists, turns, and surprises
Funny and Wise, Rosie Is

A valiant attempt to right an historic wrongAlmost from the moment the bombs stopped falling, the rush was on to hold someone responsible for the catastrophe. Anxious to draw attention away from errors (or, according to some, deliberate policy decisions) by senior officials in Washington, D.C., government investigators and their defenders fingered Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and General Walter Short, the commanders in Hawaii, as the men to blame.
Beach sees this as accusation as a slur on the memories of two competent and dedicated officers. Kimmel and Short, Beach argues, did the best they could with the incomplete information and insufficient tools they were given. Beach does not subscribe to the 'Roosevelt knew' school of thought, though he does argue that Roosevelt's policies regarding Japan made war inevitable. Beach's main criticisms are directed at America's military and diplomatic intelligence services, short-sighted budget priorities, and political pressure to 'make someone pay' for what happened.
Very useful in its own right is Beach's concluding 'References' section, in which he shares his thoughts on nearly three dozen books, articles, and government reports on the Pearl Harbor attack. Toland, Prange, Clausen, George Morgenstern, and other key pillars of Pearl Harbor historiography are all covered in this chapter.
Author of the classic navy story 'Run Silent, Run Deep,' Captain Beach is a skilled writer as well as a keen observer, and the prose in this relatively short book never lags. 'Scapegoats' helped start the movement, still ongoing in Congress and elsewhere, to rehabilitate Kimmel's and Short's reputations, and clear their names of six decades of tarnish and shame. Beach ably makes a strong case for righting this wrong as soon as possible.
A compelling defense of Kimmel and Short